Stenberg v. Carhart: women retain their right to choose.

Location and life: how Stenberg v. Carhart undercut Roe v. Wade.

Winter count: taking stock of abortion rights after Casey and Carhart.

This article outlines the current landscape of the constitutional right to abortion established in Roe v. Wade. Analyzing the court’s holdings in Planned Parenthood v. Casey and Stenberg v. Carhart, the author details the ways in which recognition of a government interest in potential life at any stage in a pregnancy, as well as the lofty “undue burden” standard in analyzing policies that hinde...

Gonzales v. Carhart (2007)

In Gonzales v. Carhart (2007), the US Supreme Court held in a five-to-four decision that the 2003 Partial-Birth Abortion Ban Act [5] passed by the US Congress was constitutional. Although the Court previously ruled in Stenberg v. Carhart (2000) that a Nebraska law that prohibited partial-birth abortions [6] was unconstitutional, Gonzales reversed this decision. Gonzales created the precedent th...

Gonzales v. Carhart (2007)

In Gonzales v. Carhart (2007), the US Supreme Court held in a five-to-four decision that the 2003 Partial-Birth Abortion Ban Act [5] passed by the US Congress was constitutional. Although the Court previously ruled in Stenberg v. Carhart (2000) that a Nebraska law that prohibited partial-birth abortions [6] was unconstitutional, Gonzales reversed this decision. Gonzales created the precedent th...

Gonzales v. Carhart (2007)

In Gonzales v. Carhart (2007), the US Supreme Court held in a five-to-four decision that the 2003 Partial-Birth Abortion Ban Act [5] passed by the US Congress was constitutional. Although the Court previously ruled in Stenberg v. Carhart (2000) that a Nebraska law that prohibited partial-birth abortions [6] was unconstitutional, Gonzales reversed this decision. Gonzales created the precedent th...